Legal Opinion

Hagar v. Williams

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 31, 1979No. 9060PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REYNOLDS, Chief Justice.

By a bench-trial judgment, appellee recovered on an open account against appellant’s defense and counterclaim for monetary damages on the ground he was charged interest in excess of double the amount of interest allowed by law. Because appellee charged appellant interest when no interest is permitted by law, appellant is, and appellee is not, entitled to judgment. Reversed and remanded with instructions.

Appellee Bill Williams owns and operates a petroleum distributorship and a garage in Jayton under the name Bill Williams Service & Supply. A mechanic, Bert Daniels,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Houston Sash and Door Co., Inc. v. HeanerTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Houston East & West Texas Railway Co. v. De WaltTexas Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Tanner Development Co. v. FergusonTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  4. First State Bank of Bedford v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Moore v. Sabine National Bank of Port ArthurCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. George A. Fuller Co. v. Carpet Services, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Industrial Disposal Supply Co. v. Perryman Bros. Trash Service, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1983
  3. Dryden v. City National Bank of Laredo, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1984
  4. Williams v. BackCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  5. Allen v. American General Finance, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2008

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API