United States v. Jose Lopez
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FISHER, Circuit Judge.
In these consolidated appeals, Jose Lopez, Pedro Esparza-Diaz, Pedro Arrelucea-Zamudio, and Silvestre Brito-Hernandez (“Appellants”) challenge the constitutionality and reasonableness of the sentences they received after pleading guilty to illegal reentry, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2). 1 Appellants claim that their Fifth Amendment rights were violated as a result of the Department of Justice’s (“DOJ”) implementation of “fast-track” early disposition programs in select judicial districts. Section 5K3.1 of the United States Sentencing…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- United States v. Agustin Rivera-SantanaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. DeMUROCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Eric SeighmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Cosme OidacCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Robert GriffithsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.