Legal Opinion

State v. McLean

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 17, 1978No. 33Published

1Opinion of the Court

242 S.E.2d 814 (1978)

STATE of North Carolina

v.

Robert McLEAN, Jr.

No. 33.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 17, 1978.

Rufus L. Edmisten, Atty. Gen., by Rudolph A. Ashton, III, Associate Atty. Gen., Raleigh, for the State.

Thomas P. McNamara, Raleigh, for defendant-appellant.

HUSKINS, Justice:

By his first assignment of error defendant contends the trial court improperly admitted into evidence the statements defendant made to Detective Holder. Defendant argues that at the time these statements were made he had not been given the warnings required by Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct.…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Fahy v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API