Legal Opinion

Villarreal v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided February 6, 1985No. 04-83-00265-CRPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TIJERINA, Justice.

This is an appeal from a conviction for murder. TEX.PENAL CODE ANN. § 19.-02(a)(1) (Vernon 1974). The jury found appellant guilty as charged; the trial court assessed punishment at confinement for life.

Appellant complains that the trial court committed reversible error by failing to submit to the jury the question of whether State witness Mettie Ann Dickey was an accomplice witness as a matter of fact and as a matter of law. His challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence is predicated on his assertion that Mettie Ann was an accomplice witness and that there was no…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Cady v. DombrowskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. United States v. SalvucciSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Carrillo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Villarreal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  2. Johnson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1987
  3. Creel v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1986
  4. Black v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
  5. Marquez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API