Miller & Lux, Inc. v. Sacramento & San Joaquin Drainage District
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP CALIFORNIA. The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McReynolds
This cause is here upon writ of error to the Supreme Court of the State of California. 182 California, 252. There is also an application for certiorari, but under the settled practice no adequate grounds therefor are shown.
By the Act of May 26, 1913, effective August 10, 1913 (Stats. 1913, p. 252), the legislature of California undertook to create the Sacramento and San Joaquin Drainage District, including 1,725,553 acres along the general course of the Sacramento and San Joaquin rivers, and particularly an extensive area south of Stockton. The Reclamation Board,-appointed as directed by the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Houck v. Little River Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Myles Salt Co. v. Board of Comm'rs of Iberia and St. Mary Drainage Dist.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
3Cited by37 opinions
- Valley Farms Co. of Yonkers v. County of WestchesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Martin v. Dade Muck Land Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1928
- Evans v. Beattie, Comptroller GeneralSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
- State Ex Rel. Brush v. Sixth Taxing DistrictSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Robert T. Foley Co. v. Washington Suburban Sanitary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.