Lopez v. State

OPINION

HINOJOSA, Justice.

A jury found appellant guilty of aggravated sexual assault and assessed punishment at life imprisonment. By three points of error, appellant challenges the evidence of penetration, contends that the State failed to rebut his defense of alibi, and cites as error the admission of a psychologist’s testimony. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Appellant’s first point challenges the sufficiency of the evidence of penetration. The charge required the jury to find that appellant caused his sexual organ to penetrate the anus of R.L., a child younger than fourteen years.…