Legal Opinion

State v. Madrid

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided April 10, 1985No. 15348PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLIVER, Acting Judge.

This is an appeal from a jury verdict and a judgment of conviction, which found defendant-appellant guilty of the crime of incest. The issue presented herein is whether incest is a lesser included offense of rape. We hold that the trial court's instruction to the jury, that incest is a lesser included offense of the crime charged, was error. We set the judgment of conviction aside, on the basis that the defendant was convicted of a crime with which he had never been charged.

The facts necessary to an understanding of this case are basically that defendant *737was charged with…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. State v. ThompsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. HallIdaho Supreme Court · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Gina Antoinette BrownerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  2. State v. DordainSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API