Legal Opinion

Wiebenson v. Board of Trustees, Teachers' & State Employees' Retirement System

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 16, 1996No. COA95-1070PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

I

Petitioner first argues that the superior court erred in concluding that petitioner was not a State “employee” within the meaning of G.S. 135-1(10). All State “employees” are members of the Teachers’ and State Employees’ Retirement System. G.S. 135-3(1). G.S. 135-1(10) provides in pertinent part:

“Employee” shall mean all full-time employees, agents or officers of the State of North Carolina or any of its departments, bureaus and institutions other than educational, whether such employees are elected, appointed or employed. . . . Employees of State agencies, departments,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fike v. Board of Trustees, Teachers' & State Employees' Retirement SystemCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Patterson v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McCaskill v. Department of State TreasurerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  2. Wiebenson v. Board of Trustees, Teachers' & State Employees' Retirement SystemCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  3. McCaskill v. Department of State TreasurerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  4. McCaskill v. Department of State TreasurerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API