Wiebenson v. Board of Trustees, Teachers' & State Employees' Retirement System
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Judge.
I
Petitioner first argues that the superior court erred in concluding that petitioner was not a State “employee” within the meaning of G.S. 135-1(10). All State “employees” are members of the Teachers’ and State Employees’ Retirement System. G.S. 135-3(1). G.S. 135-1(10) provides in pertinent part:
“Employee” shall mean all full-time employees, agents or officers of the State of North Carolina or any of its departments, bureaus and institutions other than educational, whether such employees are elected, appointed or employed. . . . Employees of State agencies, departments,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Fike v. Board of Trustees, Teachers' & State Employees' Retirement SystemCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Patterson v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
3Cited by4 opinions
- McCaskill v. Department of State TreasurerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- Wiebenson v. Board of Trustees, Teachers' & State Employees' Retirement SystemCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- McCaskill v. Department of State TreasurerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- McCaskill v. Department of State TreasurerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010