Legal Opinion

Commercial Financial Services, Inc. v. Arthur Andersen LLP

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided April 6, 2004No. 99,546PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

JERRY L. GOODMAN, Judge.

¶ 1 Arthur Andersen, LLP, appeals the trial court’s grant of motions to dismiss filed by third-party defendants Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., and Fitch, Inc., a successor to Fitch Investors Services, L.P. and Duff & Phelps Credit Rating Company (collectively, the Rating Agencies). Andersen, an accounting firm, has been sued by Commercial Financial Services, Inc., (CFS) for professional malpractice. Andersen asserted a right of contribution against the Rating Agencies, which gave favorable ratings to securities sold by…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Jefferson County School District No. R-1 v. Moody's Investor's Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  3. Gaylord Entertainment Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  4. Delbrel v. Doenges Bros. Ford, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  5. Indiana National Bank v. State Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Constitutionality of Mandatory Registration of Credit Rating Agencies, Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel2009
  2. Mandatory Registration of Credit Rating Agencies, Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API