Hughes v. Funston & Smith
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Dubxigue District Court. Action for damages on a sale of flour. Jury trial; verdict and judgment thereon for plaintiff. The defendants appeal. , ' '
1Opinion of the CourtCole, J.
The petition in this case is as follows. “Plaintiff complains of defendants, and avers that on or about the 27th day of April, 1866, defendants verbally bargained and sold to plaintiff. 136 barrels of flour, as and for' extra Cedar Kapids flour, at the agreed price of $7,75 a barrel, and plaintiff then paid *258defendants $1,000, in part of the purchase-money therefor ; that prior to, and at the time of said sale, defendants represented and stated to plaintiff that £aid flour was good, sound,.merchantable, extra flour; and the same being on board the cars, at Dunleith, in the State of Illinois,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Carley v. WilkinsNew York Supreme Court · 1849
3Cited by11 opinions
- Callanan v. Brown & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1871
- Swift & Co. v. RedheadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Hercules Powder Co. v. RichCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
- Boysen v. PetersenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
- Figge v. HillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.