Legal Opinion

McKain v. Central Nebraska Public Power & Irrigation District

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1940No. 30905PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimmons, C. J.

In this action plaintiffs seek to recover compensation for lands taken and consequential damages to lands not taken by the defendant in a condemnation proceeding. Defendant admits liability and tenders an issue as to the amount due the plaintiffs. Judgment was for the plaintiffs on a jury verdict.

On appeal, defendant contends:(1) The court erred in permitting the jury to include in their verdict recovery for certain lands in the river bed, claimed by plaintiffs to be riparian to lands taken.(2) The verdict is excessive and is the result of passion and prejudice.

The first question presented by…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McGinley v. Platte Valley Public Power & Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Higgins v. AdelsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Bay City Gas-Light Co. v. Industrial WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Wiggenhorn v. KountzNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
  5. McBride v. WhitakerNebraska Supreme Court · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Oliver v. ThomasNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Heider v. KautzNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Mingus v. BellNebraska Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API