Legal Opinion

Wiggenhorn v. Kountz

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1888PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error to the district court for Saunders county. Tried below before Post, J. Bissell v. Fletcher, 19 Neb., 727. Hopkins v. Dickinson, 9 Cush., 548. Middeton v. Pritchard, 3 Scam., £21. Porter v. White, 13 Wis., 625. Miller v. P. P. Co., 71 N. Y., 384. Buse v. Russell, 86 Mo., 209, Rammers v. Hissen, 4 Neb., 245. 3 Washburn Real Prop., 452. Woodbury v. Short, 17 Yt., 387.

1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.

The defendant in error brought an action against the plaintiffs, in the district court of Sauuders county, to re*692cover the value of certain trees .cut down by, and converted to the use of, the plaintiffs in error. The defendant in error alleges, in his petition, “ That from the 7th day of December, 1871, until the 29th day of November, 1882, he was the owner in fee simple, and in the possession of lot one in section thirty, in township thirteen north, of range ten east, in Saunders county; that on or about the first day of September, 1881, and between that date and said 29th day of Novembei’,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Buse v. RussellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1885
  2. People ex rel. Tibbits v. Canal AppraisersNew York Supreme Court · 1835
  3. Lammers v. NissenNebraska Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Higgins v. AdelsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Gill v. LydickNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Minick v. HuffNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Topping v. CohnNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Bouvier v. StricklettNebraska Supreme Court · 1894

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API