Legal Opinion

Stockdale v. Sellers

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 14, 1931No. Appeal 185PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Drew, J.,

The opinion of the learned court below, by Sayebs, P. J., with the exception of parts relating to equity practice not material here, was as follows:

“The plaintiff in the bill filed in this case, alleges that a parol agreement was entered into between'the plaintiff and the defendant whereby the defendant sold to plaintiff a one-twentieth interest in a certain drilling well which plaintiff alleges afterwards became a good gas well and subsequently produced gas in large quantities. The plaintiff claims that he was to become a partner to the extent of the undivided interest…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Barnsdall v. Bradford Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  2. Shaw v. CornmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  3. Brown v. BeecherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  4. Mellon v. DavisonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  5. Soles v. HickmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1853

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hetrick v. Apollo Gas Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. SZYMANOWSKI v. BraceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Nolt v. TS Calkins & Associates, LPSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Redditt v. HornSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  5. Dobbs v. Vornado, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API