Legal Opinion

People v. Young

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 3, 2012PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*740Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court did not improperly curtail the right of his counsel to participate in the jury selection process (see CPL 270.15 [1]; see also People v Jean, 75 NY2d 744 [1989]; People v Thompson, 45 AD3d 876, 877 [2007]).

However, we agree with the defendant that the People failed to present legally sufficient evidence of “physical injury” to sustain his conviction of robbery in the second degree (see Penal Law § 160.10 [2] [a]; People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621 [1983]). “Physical injury” is defined as “impairment of physical condition or substantial…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. In re Philip A.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. People v. AlmonteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  4. People v. JeanNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. People v. ThompsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. BoneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. People v. ColeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  3. People v. StokesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  4. People v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  5. People v. TactikosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API