People v. Jean
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*745OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
During the court’s voir dire in this case, each member of three panels of prospective jurors orally answered a detailed biographical questionnaire, and when necessary and in response to questioning by the court, clarified those answers. The trial court, over defendant’s objection, then exercised its discretion by imposing a time limit of 15 minutes on each attorney’s voir dire in the first two rounds and 10 minutes for the third round. As a result of these time limits, defense counsel did not individually…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rosales-Lopez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- People v. BoulwareNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- People v. PepperNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
3Cited by84 opinions
- People v. JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- People v. VargasNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- State v. PurdyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. StewardNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
- People v. DashoshAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.