Monks v. Hemphill
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Hilliard
On motion of defendant in error to “dismiss the application for supersedeas, and to * * * issue remittitur,” etc., for that, as said, plaintiff in error has not filed bond as required by our order.
It appears that January 12, 1949, plaintiff in error, proceeding in due course, filed the record and docketed the case on error, sought and obtained a writ of error in manner provided by our Rules of Civil Procedure, and simultaneously applied for supersedeas; that January 13, 1949, supersedeas was granted, conditioned that within ten days plaintiff in error shall file bond in the sum of fifteen…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dulin v. Pacific Wood & Coal Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
- Williams v. BruffySupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Ex Parte FrenchSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Riant Amusement Co. v. BaileySupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
- Young v. KidderNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1930
3Cited by7 opinions
- Muck v. Arapahoe County District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Zurich Insurance Company v. BonebrakeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
- Hart v. SchwabColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
- Molini v. Sociedad Mario Mercado e HijosSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1952
- Colorado Korean Ass'n v. KOREAN SEN. ASS'N.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.