Legal Opinion
United States v. President & Directors of Manhattan Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided January 11, 1938PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRippey, J.
Upon motion of defendant, President and Directors of the Manhattan Company, successor to the Bank of the Manhattan Trust Company, as agent or depository of the Northern Insurance Company of Moscow and as assignee for the benefit of creditors of the Northern Insurance Company of Moscow, under the provisions of rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, an order was made at Special Term dismissing the complaint on the ground that the complaint fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The Appellate Division has unanimously affirmed and has certified to us that in its…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United States v. BelmontSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Independent Wireless Telegraph Co. v. Radio Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Dougherty v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- M. Salimoff & Co. v. Standard Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Sokoloff v. National City BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- John Zwack, Bela Zwack and Dora Zwack, as Co-Partners Doing Business as J. Zwack & Company v. Kraus Bros. & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Bank of China v. Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1952
- Sulyok v. Penzintezeti Kozpont BudapestAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- Bollack v. Societe Generale Pour Favoriser le Developpement du Commerce et de L'Industrie en FranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
- Stephen v. Zivnostenska Banka, National Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.