Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Castello v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 5, 2018No. 01-16-00742-CRPublished

1ConcurrenceJennings, J.

CONCURRING OPINION

Terry Jennings, Justice

I concur in the judgment of the Court and write separately to explain why although I would hold that appellant, Brian Castello, an indigent criminal defendant, has met his burden of establishing that Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 102.011(a)(3) is unconstitutional as applied to him because it violates his right to confrontation, I agree that under this Court's precedent, we must, at this time, overrule his challenge. See London v. State , 526 S.W.3d 596 (Tex. App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2017, pet. ref'd).1

Appellant, without an agreed…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API