Legal Opinion

Hudson v. State

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 30, 1928Published

1Opinion of the CourtFarr, J.

The first assignment for error is that the justice of the peace did not have jurisdiction and therefore was without authority to try the cause below, in view of the principle announced in the case of Tumey v. State of Ohio, and also Williams v. State of Ohio. However, the jurisdictional question was not raised in the trial court and can not now avail.

Next, it is insisted that the trial court was guilty of prejudicial error in that it proceeded to hear the evidence in the case in the absence of the defendant and his counsel. The record discloses that the accused and his counsel stepped out on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gano v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Ry. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Woody v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API