Legal Opinion

Procter & Gamble Co. v. Bankers Trust Co.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided December 20, 1995No. C-1-94-735PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER UPHOLDING THE ASSERTION OF SPOUSAL PRIVILEGE BY JACK AND ROBIN LAVIN

FEIKENS, District Judge.

I. Background

In this complex derivative instruments case, Plaintiff Procter & Gamble (“P & G”) has sought extensive discovery from Defendants Bankers Trust Company and BT Securities Corporation (“BT”). A large part of this discovery has focused on what has been termed the “Bankers Trust tapes,” recordings made by BT of conversations between its traders and customers. BT’s automated process records all conversations on specific phones primarily for purposes of settling trade disputes.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Wolfle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Blau v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. United States v. S. Mohammad MarashiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. Hershel CLADY, Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. McCollumCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
  2. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jack Lavin and Robin LavinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
  3. Beller v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2003
  4. Securities & Exchange Commission v. LavinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996
  5. Phoenix v. EsperDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API