Legal Opinion
Colvin v. Housing Authority
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided January 4, 1996No. 95-2455PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Per curiam
This appeal arises from the District Court’s judgment as a matter of law in favor of the Sarasota Housing Authority. The court held that Ms. Colvin had no right to an informal hearing before her Section 8 assistance was terminated because she participated in a state court eviction proceeding. That proceeding, according to the District Court, provided procedural due process. While we affirm the ruling regarding whether Ms. Col-vin’s procedural due process rights were violated, we REVERSE and REMAND for further proceedings because federal regulations require an informal hearing in this…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wright v. City of Roanoke Redevelopment & Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Ronald Loschiavo and Donna Loschiavo v. City of DearbornCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Lezlie Sherrin v. Northwestern National Life Insurance Company, CrossCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- Belinda Ritter v. Cecil County Office of Housing and Community DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- Hosea Simmons and Andrea Williams v. William Ryan Drew and the Housing Authority of the City of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Bateman v. Mnemonics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- Harris v. JamesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- Bateman v. Mnemonics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Batista v. Cooperativa De Vivienda Jardines De San IgnacioCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
- Broaddus v. Florida Power Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.