Legal Opinion
Robert v. Carter
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided May 3, 2011No. 1:09-cv-0425-JMS-TABPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JANE MAGNUS-STINSON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Ray Robert alleges that Defendants Douglas G. Carter, the Hamilton County Council and the Hamilton County Board of Commissioners (“Defendants”) failed to exempt him from TASER training or to provide him a reasonable accommodation in violation of his rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”). He further claims that Defendants terminated his employment without a hearing in violation of his procedural and substantive due process rights. Presently before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. [Dkt. 51.]
I
Standard of…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Ingraham v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Nash v. Optomec, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2016
- Jacqueline Lewis v. City of Union City, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
- Jacqueline Lewis v. City of Union City, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017