Chopp Computer Corporation, Inc., a British Columbia Corporation v. United States of America Painewebber Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1DissentReinhardt, Circuit Judge
The majority holds that the United States can step in and seize the funds in a judgment debtor’s investment account, even though it knows that a state court has already issued a preliminary injunction against the debtor’s use of those funds in another judgment creditor’s favor. I believe that the majority’s opinion is unwarranted in light of existing precedent. I also believe that the majority erroneously rewards the government for its improper conduct. Accordingly, I dissent.
A. Constructive Trust.
The majority argues that CHoPP cannot prevail on its conversion claim against the United States…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Rose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Bainbridge v. StonerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Custer v. McCutcheonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Berger v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- H. J. Heinz Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.