Legal Opinion · Dissent

Chopp Computer Corporation, Inc., a British Columbia Corporation v. United States of America Painewebber Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 29, 1993No. 91-15991Published

1DissentReinhardt, Circuit Judge

The majority holds that the United States can step in and seize the funds in a judgment debtor’s investment account, even though it knows that a state court has already issued a preliminary injunction against the debtor’s use of those funds in another judgment creditor’s favor. I believe that the majority’s opinion is unwarranted in light of existing precedent. I also believe that the majority erroneously rewards the government for its improper conduct. Accordingly, I dissent.

A. Constructive Trust.

The majority argues that CHoPP cannot prevail on its conversion claim against the United States…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Rose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Bainbridge v. StonerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Custer v. McCutcheonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Berger v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. H. J. Heinz Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API