Legal Opinion

Myers v. Finkle

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided November 28, 1990No. Civ. A. 89-571-NPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

DOUMAR, District Judge.

This action was brought to recover damages for alleged violations of § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j, and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder (Count I), and of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1961 et seq. (Count V). Plaintiffs have added pendent state law claims for fraud (Count II), breach of fiduciary duty (Count III), and negligence (Count IV).

The plaintiffs allege that as a result of advice received from defendants, their accountants, they invested large sums of money in real estate…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Myers v. FinkleCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
  2. Hall v. Burger King Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1995
  3. Andrews v. FitzgeraldDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1993
  4. Williams v. Equity Holding Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2007
  5. Field v. GMAC LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API