Legal Opinion

State v. Paaluhi

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1989No. 12828PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

HAYASHI, J.

Plaintiff-Appellant State of Hawaii (State) appeals the judgment sentencing Defendant-Appellee Earl Leilani Paaluhi (Paaluhi) to a $300 fine for three counts of driving withoutno-fault insurance pursuant to Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) §§ 294-8 and 294-39. Paaluhi had com mitted the offenses at different times but was convicted plus sentenced for all three violations on the same day. State contends that 1) Paaluhi was a multiple offender; so 2) the trial court erred by not imposing the more severe, mandatory multiple offender penalties. We agree, therefore…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. MonizHawaii Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. RodriguesHawaii Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. JohnsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. AkanaHawaii Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State v. TavaresHawaii Supreme Court · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. DudoitHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. RamelaHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. BrionesHawaii Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. SimpsonHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. United States v. FautanuDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API