Legal Opinion
In Re Jack Emert and Robert D. Lundberg
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 18, 1997No. 96-1559PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RADER, Circuit Judge.
Jack Emert and Robert D. Lundberg (collectively Emert) appeal the rejection of claims 1-5 and 43-67 of application No. 07/250,887 (’887 application). The United States Patent and Trademark Office’s Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (Board) rejected Emert’s contested claims for obviousness-type double patenting. Recognizing that the Board applied the correct test and reached the proper result under the correct standard of review, this court affirms.
I
This case arises from an interference between Emert’s ’887 application and Bever-wijk et al.’s U.S. Patent No.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Structural Rubber Products Company v. Park Rubber Company and International Metals and MacHines Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- In Re Jack E. Caveney and Roy A. MoodyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- In Re Robert Goodman, Vic C. Knauf, Catherine M. Houch and Luca ComaiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Application of Virgil W. Vogel and Paul W. VogelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- General Foods Corporation v. Studiengesellschaft Kohle MbhCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- In Re Denis Rouffet, Yannick Tanguy and Frederic BerthaultCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- In re BergCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- In Re HubbellCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- In Re FallauxCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Anza Technology, Inc. v. Mushkin, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.