Legal Opinion
In Re Hubbell
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided March 7, 2013No. 2011-1547PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge O’MALLEY. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge NEWMAN.
O’MALLEY, Circuit Judge.
Jeffrey Hubbell, Jason Schense, Andre-as Zisch, and Heike Hall are the námed inventors on U.S. Patent Application No. 10/650,509 (“the '509 application”). The examiner rejected all of the pending claims — claims 1-5, 7, 9-14, 16-22, 26-30, 34, and 35 — for obviousness-type double patenting over several patents, including U.S. Patent No. 7,601,685 (“the '685 patent”). Hubbell appeals from the decision of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (“the Board”)…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re Robert J. Gartside and Richard C. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Nicholas v. Perricone, M.D. v. Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- In Re Paolo LongiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Enzo Biochem, Inc. v. Gen-Probe Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- In re OrnumCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Simpleair, Inc. v. Google LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Gilead Sciences, Inc. v. Natco Pharma LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Immunex Corporation v. Sandoz Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- Helferich Patent Licensing, LLC v. New York Times Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Inre: DinsmoreCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.