Legal Opinion

Fleming v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 11, 1966No. 41800PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deen, Judge.

1. Code § 27-2510 provides that all sentences pronounced in criminal cases shall be served concurrently “unless otherwise specifically provided therein.” Whether a sentence is to be served concurrently with or consecutively to another previously passed on the defendant and which he is engaged in serving at the time is, accordingly, a part of the second sentence, and where the court stipulates that it shall “run consecutively to any other sentence heretofore imposed upon this defendant in the State of Georgia” this provision, too, is a part of the sentence and should be pronounced…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Heard v. GillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
  2. Peppers v. BalkcomSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
  3. King v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  4. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. BrileyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  5. Chastain v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kaiser v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  2. Hinton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  3. Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  4. Sherman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  5. Crews v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API