Legal Opinion

Takao v. ZONING BD. OF ADJUSTMENT OF CITY OF BIRMINGHAM

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided March 3, 1995No. AV93000633PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John Takao appeals from a summary judgment in a zoning case. We reverse and remand.

At some time before July 24, 1991, the Birmingham director of urban planning determined that a four-unit apartment building located in the City of Birmingham had lost its nonconforming status. Takao, the owner of the building, appealed that decision to the City's Zoning Board of Adjustment on July 24, 1991. The Zoning Board held a public hearing, which resulted in the Zoning Board's overturning the director's decision. The Zoning Board's records reflect a resolution adopted at its meeting on September 12, 1991,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  2. City of Huntsville v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  3. Payne v. Department of Industrial RelationsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  4. Kaller v. RigdonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  5. Franklin Life Ins. Co. v. PEOPLES BANK & TR.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte City of Fairhope & Bd. of AdjustmentsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  2. S.A.T. v. E.D.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007
  3. IPSCO Steel, Inc. v. Alabama Department of Environmental ManagementCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002
  4. L.E.D. v. State Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2004
  5. Sat v. EdCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API