Legal Opinion

Sat v. Ed

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided May 11, 2007No. 2060164Published

1Opinion of the Court

972 So.2d 804 (2007)

S.A.T.

v.

E.D.

2060164.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

May 11, 2007.

Karen H. Jackson, Prattville, for appellant.

B. Diane Paris, Montgomery, for appellee.

BRYAN, Judge.

S.A.T. ("the mother") appeals a judgment insofar as it modified the child-support obligation of E.D. ("the father") from 8365 per month to $175 per month, found the mother in contempt, and awarded the father an attorney's fee in the amount of $250. We dismiss the appeal in part and affirm the judgment in part.

The father and the mother, who have never been married, had one child together. That child was born in…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Andrews v. Merritt Oil Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. MotleySupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  3. New Properties, L.L.C. v. StewartSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  4. State Department of Human Resources v. R.E.C.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  5. GULF BEACH HOTEL v. State Ex Rel. WhetstoneSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API