Janesville Sand & Gravel Co. v. Industrial Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCrownhart, J.
Counsel for appellant ably argue that one may not become dependent by his voluntary act; that dependency, as understood in the compensation law, means actual dependency in fact. In other words, as we understand the position of appellant, it is that a dependent within the law must be incapable of earning his own support in whole or in part.
The legislature may very well have taken that view if it chose to do so. The question here is, Did it do so, or did it provide that one who draws her sole support from a parent, without any contractual relation and with no other means of support, is wholly…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bloomington-Bedford Stone Co. v. PhillipsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
- Herrick's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Peterson v. Industrial Accident CommisionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Dix v. Somerset Coal Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- In re LanmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
3Cited by12 opinions
- McKesson-Fuller-Morrisson Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- Meyler v. Mayor and City CouncilCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1941
- Employers Mutual Liability Ins. Co. of Wis. v. JardeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
- Basham v. R. H. Lowe, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1940
- Harris v. HoageCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1933
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.