Legal Opinion
Almada v. Admr., Unemployment Act
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided April 6, 1950No. File 85900PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtAlcorn, J.
The General Ice Cream Corporation, Bryant and Chapman and R. G. Miller divisions, hereinafter referred to-as the employer, appeals from an award of unemployment compensation benefits to the plaintiffs, hereinafter referred to as the employees. The appeal assigns error in the conclusion that the employees were eligible for compensation because their unemployment was due to a lockout, in the conclusion that the employees were not ineligible for compensation because their employment was due to a labor dispute, and in the commissioners’ refusal to correct the finding.
The finding contains…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Iron Molders' Union No. 125 of Milwaukee v. Allischalmers Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1908
- Palumbo v. George A. Fuller Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Waterbury Savings Bank v. DanaherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Adkins v. Indiana Employment Security DivisionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1946
- King v. SpencerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Almada v. Admr, Unemployment CompensationConnecticut Superior Court · 1952