Goodstein v. Silver Plume Mines Co.
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell
This action by the plaintiffs Goldstein and Whitehead is one to recover from the The Silver Plume Mines Company, a corporation, and Cole, its president, the balance of a commission claimed to be due plaintiffs as brokers for negotiating a sale and transfer of the mining property of the defendant company. It seems that Cole was not served and did not appear and his individual rights were not determined. At the close of plaintiffs’ evidence the defendants’ motion for a nonsuit was granted and the action was dismissed, to review which is the object of this writ.
It is a recognized rule in this…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- McGonigle v. KleinColorado Court of Appeals · 1895
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wallick v. EatonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1943
- Elliott v. ParrSupreme Court of Colorado · 1937
- Denton v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1937
- Haefeli v. AhlstrandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1937
- Layton Construction Co. v. Shaw Contract Flooring Services, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.