Legal Opinion

Tap Electrical Contracting Service, Inc. v. Hartnett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 22, 1989PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a final order and determination of the respondent Thomas F. Hartnett, Commissioner of Labor of the State of New York, dated October 31, 1989, which, after a hearing, found the petitioner in willful violation of Labor Law article 8 and, inter alia, barred it from bidding on or being awarded any New York State public work contract for a period of five years pursuant to Labor Law § 220-b (3) (b).

Adjudged that the petition is granted, on the law, without costs or disbursements, to the extent of annulling so much of the final order and determination…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Massachusetts v. MorashSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Monarch Electrical Contracting Corp. v. RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1987

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Construction & General Laborers' District Council of Chicago & Vicinity v. James McHugh Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  2. MATTER OF TAP ELEC. CONTRACTING SERV., INC. v. HartnettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API