Legal Opinion

State v. Burgess

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided September 2, 1983No. 82-332-C.APublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHEA, Justice.

The defendant, Maurice Burgess (Burgess), appeals from Superior Court jury convictions of first- and second-degree sexual assault and committing an abominable and detestable crime against nature. The state concedes that we should vacate the conviction of committing an abominable and detestable crime against nature because this conviction and the first-degree sexual-assault conviction result from the same forcible-fellatio offense, thereby violating the double-jeopardy clause. Burgess also raises a number of other issues; however, the issue concerning the admissibility of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. JaletteSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1978
  2. State v. ContrerasSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1969
  3. State v. SouzaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1983
  4. State v. PinaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1983
  5. In Re DanielSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1983

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Stephens v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. GasparSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2009
  3. State v. MoralesSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2006
  4. State v. CrowhurstSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1984
  5. State v. OliveiraSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API