Burk v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSanford, J.
The error pointed out by demurrer in the first count of'the indictment is clerical and by its nature is self-correcting. The demurrer was properly overruled.
Refused charge 5 seeks to confine the inquiry to an actual participation by defendant in the assault made on Luther Hale, pretermitting a consideration of aiding or abetting the crime. The charge is patently erroneous as applied to the facts in this case.
Refused charge 6 invades the province of the jury. The evidence tends to prove a conspiracy between the defendant and two others, and everything done and said in furtherance of the common…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lancaster v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
- Jaco v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925
3Cited by12 opinions
- McCord v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986
- Cook v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
- King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
- Wade v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
- Porter v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1941
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.