Legal Opinion

Wright v. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1903No. 19,976PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Erom Clark Circuit Court; J. K. Marsh, Judge. Action by William Wrigbt against the Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Company. Erom a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. Transferred from Appellate Court, under §1337u Burns 1901.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.

This was an action brought by the appellant to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have resulted from the negligence of the appellee. A trial of the cause was had before a jury, a general verdict being returned in favor of the appellant. The jury also returned answers'to a number of interrogatories submitted by the court at the request of the appellee. On motion of appellee *585the court rendered judgment for appellee on the answers to the interrogatories, notwithstanding the general verdict. The assignment of errors calls in question only the action of the court in so rendering…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Consolidated Stone Co. v. SummitIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  2. City of South Bend v. TurnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Southern Indiana Railway Co. v. PeytonIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Louisville & N. R. v. KellyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1894
  5. Chicago & Erie Railroad v. LeeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Lyons v. City of New AlbanyIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Avery v. Nordyke & Marmon Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1904
  3. Chicago & Erie Railroad v. LawrenceIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HaasIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
  5. Standard Steel Car Co. v. MartineczIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API