Legal Opinion
The Tietjen & Lang No. 2
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 19, 1944No. 8666PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARIS, Circuit Judge.
The libellant has moved to dismiss the appeal taken by the respondents in this admiralty case upon the ground that it was not applied for in time. The motion is based upon Alaska Packers v. Pillsbury, 1937, 301 U.S. 174, 57 S.Ct. 682, 81 L.Ed. 988. In that case the Supreme Court held that appeals in admiralty are governed by Sec. 8(c) of the Act of February 13, 1925, c. 229, 43 Stat. 940, 28 U.S.C.A. § 230, which provides that “No * * * appeal intended to bring any judgment or decree before a circuit court of appeals for review shall be allowed unless application therefor…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Prudence Securities Advisory GroupSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Alaska Packers Assn. v. PillsburySupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Cardona v. QuinonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Steffler v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. VigilSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Congregation Poiley TzedeckCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Georgia Hardwood Lumber Co. v. Compania De Navegacion Transmar, S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945