Legal Opinion

Community State Bank v. Day

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 1923No. 17990PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

— This action was brought by the Community State Bank of Mabton to recover on a promissory note of $1,000, dated January 10,1921, due January 10, 1922, made and delivered to it by the defendant. The answer was that the note had been procured by false representations on the part of the plaintiff, it knowing them to be false when made; that they were made wdth the intent to deceive; that the defendant believed them and relying thereon executed and delivered the note: Verdict and judgment were for the defendant, from which the plaintiff has appealed.

The note was given for ten shares, at par…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Christensen v. KochWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Hitt Fireworks Co. v. Scandinavian American BankWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Merrick v. AppenzellerWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Boehme v. Broadway Theater Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Gilluly v. HosfordWashington Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sova v. First Nat. Bk. of FerndaleWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  2. De Swarte v. First National BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Associated Indemnity Corp. v. Del GuzzoWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Hahn v. BrickellWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Blewett v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API