Legal Opinion

Lietzke v. Greyhound Lines, Inc. (MAG+)

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided May 3, 2023No. 2:21-cv-00208Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION BILL LIETZKE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CASE NO. 2:21-cv-208-WKW-JTA ) (WO) GREYHOUND LINES, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Before the court is the Complaint1 (Doc. No. 1) filed by pro se Plaintiff Bill Lietzke, who is proceeding in forma pauperis. (Doc. No. 8.) For the reasons stated below, the court recommends that this action be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API