Legal Opinion
Clotz v. B.A. Mason, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided March 5, 2024No. 1:23-cv-01426Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO : TERRY CLOTZ, : CASE NO. 1:23-cv-01426 : Plaintiff, : OPINION & ORDER : [Resolving Doc. 12] v. : : MASON COMPANIES, INC., : : Defendant. : : : JAMES S. GWIN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: In this Telephone Consumer Protection Act case, Defendant Mason Companies, Inc. seeks to compel arbitration and to stay this case. Because there is no enforceable arbitration agreement, the Court DENIES Mason’s arbitration motion. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Terry Clotz claims that, in July 2023, he received multiple unwanted calls from Defendant…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Litton Financial Printing Div., Litton Business Systems, Inc. v. NLRBSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- I. C. v. StockX, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
- Zucker v. After Six, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Kasie Stevens-Bratton v. TruGreenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017