Legal Opinion

United States v. Hartenfeld

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 11, 1940No. 7208PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KERNER, Circuit Judge.

The indictment^ consisting of nineteen counts charged in the first eighteen a scheme to defraud and the use of the United States mails in the furtherance of the same in violation of Section 215 of the Criminal Code, 18 U.S.C.A. § 338, and in the nineteenth count charged that the appellant and Ethel Pitt Donnell, Robert D. Beckett and John K. Knapp unlawfully conspired to use the United States mails in furtherance of a scheme to defraud, 18 U.S.C.A. § 88. The case was tried to a jury. Co-defendants Donnell and Beckett pleaded guilty. The jury returned a verdict of not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tinkoff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1936
  2. United States v. HoltCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
  3. United States v. MorleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. George v. ArlenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
  2. The United States of America v. Julius L. Echeles, the United States of America v. Paul EchelesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
  3. Council v. ClemmerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
  4. Willard Donnell Fahning v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
  5. United States v. ThayerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API