Legal Opinion

In re Feagan

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided April 11, 2016No. Case No. 15-40823-pwbPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON TRUSTEE’S OBJECTION TO CONFIRMATION

Paul W. Bonapfel, U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge

The issue in this case is whether an “above-median” ' Chapter 13 debtor with car payments on account of a nonpurchase-money debt may deduct the Ownership Costs allowance for purposes of calculating his projected disposable income (“PDF”) under 11 U.S.C. § 1325(b). The Court concludes that the allowance is applicable regardless of the type of debt that encumbers a vehicle.

The projected disposable income test of 11 U.S.C. § 1325(b) prohibits confirmation of a Chapter 13 plan that does not provide for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ransom v. FIA Card Services, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. In re SiresUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia · 2014

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re LopezUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 2017
  2. In re TraylorUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 2019
  3. Tanner Scott CampbellUnited States Bankruptcy Court, District of Columbia · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API