Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Weidul

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 13, 1993Published

1Dissent

CLIFFORD, Justice,

with whom COLLINS, J., joins, dissenting.

I agree with the Court that the trial court should use the A.B.A. standard instructions for lengthy deliberations and apparently deadlocked juries. See State v. White, 285 A.2d 832, 838 (Me.1972). I disagree, however, that the trial court’s instructions in this case varied from the A.B.A. standards to such a degree that they constitute obvious error. Therefore, I respectfully dissent.

In instructing a jury that has demonstrated some difficulty in reaching a verdict, the court should encourage continued deliberation with a view to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. TrueSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  2. State v. WhiteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
  3. State v. MahaneySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  4. State v. QuintSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  5. State v. CoteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API