Padrevita v. City of Lake Worth
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ANSTEAD, Judge.
This is an appeal from the dismissal of a complaint for malicious prosecution. We affirm.
John Padrevita was charged with violating the ordinances of the City of Lake Worth by acts contributing to the delinquency of a minor. The alleged acts were the purchase of a six pack of beer and a can of Ban deodorant, the beer allegedly for consumption by the minor and the deodorant for inhaling by the same minor. Pa-drevita was convicted in the municipal court. On appeal to the circuit court his conviction was reversed on the grounds of insufficient evidence and the improper admission…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Holliday v. HollidayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Goldstein v. SabellaSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
- White v. BrinkmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Carpenter v. SibleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Norton v. John M. C. Marble Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ware v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1997
- Schlesser v. LevinsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981