Legal Opinion

Padrevita v. City of Lake Worth

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 21, 1979No. 77-1866PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANSTEAD, Judge.

This is an appeal from the dismissal of a complaint for malicious prosecution. We affirm.

John Padrevita was charged with violating the ordinances of the City of Lake Worth by acts contributing to the delinquency of a minor. The alleged acts were the purchase of a six pack of beer and a can of Ban deodorant, the beer allegedly for consumption by the minor and the deodorant for inhaling by the same minor. Pa-drevita was convicted in the municipal court. On appeal to the circuit court his conviction was reversed on the grounds of insufficient evidence and the improper admission…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Holliday v. HollidayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Goldstein v. SabellaSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  3. White v. BrinkmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. Carpenter v. SibleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Norton v. John M. C. Marble Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ware v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1997
  2. Schlesser v. LevinsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API