Legal Opinion

Excevarria v. Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 17, 2019No. 18-1492Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

18-1492 Excevarria v. Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT=S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Koch v. Christie's International PLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  4. City of Pontiac Policemen's & Firemen's Retirement System v. UBS AGCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
  5. Caro v. WeintraubCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API