Legal Opinion

Murray v. Geithner

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided May 26, 2009No. Civil 08-15147PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

LAWRENCE P. ZATKOFF, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ motion to dismiss [dkt 6]. The parties have fully briefed the motion. The Court finds that the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the parties’ papers such that the decision process would not be significantly aided by oral argument. Therefore, pursuant to E.D. Mich. L.R. 7.1(e)(2), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion be resolved on the briefs submitted. For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ motion is DENIED.

II. BACKGROUND

According to the parties, a…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mercedes Benz USA LLC v. BombardierDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019
  2. Mercedes Benz USA LLC v. LewisDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019
  3. Mercedes Benz USA LLC v. SotoDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019
  4. Yarber v. M.J. Electric, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API