Layton v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
HARPER, Judge.
—Motion is made by the Assistant Attorney-General to dismiss the appeal herein on the ground that the recognizance is not sufficient to give this court jurisdiction. An inspection of the recognizance discloses that the motion is well taken. See Bird v. State, Switzer v. State, and Hardin v. State, this day decided. The motion is sustained, and the appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Dismissed.
2Cited by7 opinions
- State v. ShepardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
- Caldarera v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Heffnarn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
- King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.