Legal Opinion

Nagle v. Snohomish County

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 19, 2005No. 54322-9-IPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

119 P.3d 914 (2005)

James T. NAGLE, a single person, Respondent,

v.

SNOHOMISH COUNTY, Appellant.

No. 54322-9-I.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

September 19, 2005.

Jodi Harrison, Civil Div. Snohomish Co. Pros., Everett, WA., for Appellant.

J. Robert Leach, Attorney at Law, Everett, WA, for Respondent.

COX, C.J.

¶ 1 An "innocent purchaser for value without actual notice" of an illegal subdivision of property is one who has given valuable consideration without express knowledge of the subdivision of the property.[1] In this Land Use Petition Act (LUPA) proceeding, James Nagle fails in his…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. JacobsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Washington Public Ports Ass'n v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Skagit State Bank v. RasmussenWashington Supreme Court · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rapid Settlements, Ltd. v. Symetra Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  2. Woo v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  3. Woo v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  4. Shaw v. Clallam CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  5. Vaughn v. CohenDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API