Shaw v. Clallam County
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtBjorgen, J.
¶1 We granted the petition for discretionary review by Clallam County and Upper Elwha River Conservation Committee (collectively County) for review of a trial court order entered under the Land Use Petition Act (LUPA), chapter 36.70C RCW. Mike and Susan Shaw and George and Patricia Lane (collectively Shaw) filed the LUPA petition, alleging that the County erroneously designated portions of their property as an erosion hazard and, therefore, a critical area under Clallam County’s Critical Areas Code (Code). The superior court “remanded” the case to the administrator of Clallam County’s…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. JacobsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Cockle v. Dept. of Labor and IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Cockle v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Olivia & William Herring Et Ux v. Jose & Blanca Pelayo, Et UxCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
- Schnitzer West, Llc v. City Of PuyallupCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019